Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of ONONDAGA COUNTY COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES, on Behalf of General DAVIS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Elizabeth SMITH, Respondent-Respondent.
Respondent's son was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent and placed in the care and custody of petitioner from May 16, 2002 until January 14, 2003. Petitioner filed a petition on April 3, 2003 seeking reimbursement for expenditures in connection with that court-ordered placement. In granting respondent's objections to the order of the Support Magistrate, Family Court properly determined that petitioner was not entitled to reimbursement from respondent for expenditures made on behalf of respondent's son prior to the date on which the petition was filed inasmuch as the child was no longer in receipt of public assistance when the petition was filed (see Family Ct. Act § 449[2]; see generally Matter of Albany County Dept. of Social Servs. v. Novak, 217 A.D.2d 739, 740, 629 N.Y.S.2d 301; Matter of Toft v. Frisbie, 122 A.D.2d 456, 458, 504 N.Y.S.2d 844; Matter of Hackett v. Haynes, 70 A.D.2d 1051, 1052, 417 N.Y.S.2d 553; cf. Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs., N.Y.L.J., Jan. 12, 1999, at 30, col. 6). We note that, pursuant to the express terms of Family Court Act § 234(a) and (b), petitioner may seek support for a child placed in petitioner's care. We further note, however, that the statute does not permit petitioner to seek support when petitioner is no longer expending funds for the child's care.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 10, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)