Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DEVANTE S., and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., John H., Respondent-Appellant, v. Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. Hoffman, J.), entered on or about January 8, 2007, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent father had neglected his children, released the children to their mother's custody under petitioner's supervision for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Court Act § 1046[b][I] ) showing that respondent inflicted excessive corporal punishment on his children (see Family Court Act § 1012[f] [i][B] ). The children's out-of-court statements were cross-corroborating (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 124, 524 N.Y.S.2d 19, 518 N.E.2d 914 [1987] ). Further, the court credited the caseworker's testimony concerning respondent's angry behavior during and after a home visit and the children's apparent fearfulness in his presence. The court also appropriately considered a past adjudication of neglect against respondent that was based upon a finding of excessive corporal punishment involving the use of a belt against a toddler, as well as his current failure to follow agency recommendations (see generally Matter of Evelyn B., 30 A.D.3d 913, 915-917, 819 N.Y.S.2d 573 [2006], lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 713, 824 N.Y.S.2d 605, 857 N.E.2d 1136 [2006] ), and his failure to testify, from which the court was entitled to draw the “strongest negative inference” (Matter of Nicole H., 12 A.D.3d 182, 183, 783 N.Y.S.2d 575 [2004] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 08, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)