Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Custody, etc., KEANI D., et al., Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Gregory A., etc., Respondent-Appellant, Forestdale, Inc., Petitioner-Respondent, Commissioner of Social Services, Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about September 15, 1997, which, upon a fact-finding determination of abandonment, terminated respondent father's parental rights and placed the children with petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing proof adduced at the fact-finding hearing established that respondent had abandoned his children within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b(4)(b). Although respondent was incarcerated during the statutorily relevant six-month period, that circumstance does not excuse his failure to communicate with petitioner agency or, indeed, with his children (see, Matter of New York Foundling Hosp. v. Consuela G., 221 A.D.2d 343, 633 N.Y.S.2d 371, lv. dismissed 88 N.Y.2d 998, 649 N.Y.S.2d 370, 672 N.E.2d 595). Respondent's contention that his belief in the ability of the children's mother to care for them released him from his own parental responsibility to maintain contact with his children is without merit. Contact with the children by other family members may not be imputed to respondent to avoid a finding of abandonment against him (see, Matter of Thomas G., Jr., 165 A.D.2d 729, 564 N.Y.S.2d 32).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 28, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)