Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
37TH STREET ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. 500-512 SEVENTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about April 28, 1999, which granted plaintiffs' motion for a Yellowstone injunction on condition that plaintiffs pay certain past due and future use and occupancy, post a bond in the amount of $2,000, and tender proof of insurance, all within deadlines set by the court, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff tenants met the necessary criteria to obtain a Yellowstone injunction by showing that they (1) hold a commercial lease, (2) received a notice of default/notice to cure from the landlord, (3) made an application for injunctive relief prior to the termination of the lease, and (4) have the desire and ability to cure the alleged defaults (see, First Natl. Stores, Inc. v. Yellowstone Shopping Ctr., Inc., 21 N.Y.2d 630, 290 N.Y.S.2d 721, 237 N.E.2d 868; Empire State Bldg. Assocs. v. Trump Empire State Partners, 245 A.D.2d 225, 227, 667 N.Y.S.2d 31). Based on the hearing testimony, the motion court properly found that plaintiff tenants exercised diligence in responding to the cure notice. The application for Yellowstone relief was timely and the court properly granted said relief notwithstanding defendant landlord's belated and apparently meritless claim that plaintiffs had irremediably breached a material obligation of the parties' lease by failing to obtain certain insurance. Contrary to defendant's contention, the motion court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by failing to place more stringent conditions upon the relief afforded plaintiffs (see, CPLR 6212[b] ). Finally, we note that, although defendant contends that the motion court failed to quantify use and occupancy, that was accomplished by the court in a subsequent order.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 04, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)