Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ROSIE G., et al., Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Francis G., Respondent–Appellant, Claudius W., Respondent, Talbot Perkins Children's Services, et al., Petitioners–Respondents.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gloria Sosa–Lintner, J.), entered on or about May 19, 1997, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights to the subject children and placed the children with the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of permanent neglect against respondent mother was supported by clear and convincing evidence that respondent mother failed to plan for the children's future; although physically and financially able to do so, respondent mother failed to submit to random drug and alcohol testing and to avail herself of counseling, for both of which petitioner agency repeatedly referred her and encouraged her to submit to (see, Social Services Law § 384–b [7]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139; Matter of Juanita Katerina M., 205 A.D.2d 474, 614 N.Y.S.2d 501; Matter of Selathia Nicole F., 243 A.D.2d 400, 663 N.Y.S.2d 183, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 806, 669 N.Y.S.2d 1, 691 N.E.2d 1027). In making its permanent neglect finding, Family Court properly received in evidence, as business records, progress notes documenting respondent's repeated refusal to cooperate with referrals for counseling and random drug and alcohol testing (see, Matter of F. Children, 199 A.D.2d 81, 604 N.Y.S.2d 956). Any delay in respondent mother's receipt of the progress notes was harmless since she was provided with a complete copy of the notes prior to completion of her cross-examination of the testifying witness.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 16, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)