Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Alina KOWALEWSKI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORTH GENERAL HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants,
Big Apple Wrecking and Construction Corporation, Defendant-Respondent. North General Hospital, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Safeway Environmental Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Crow Construction Co./Becom Real, Inc., Second Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Safeway Environmental Corporation, Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered August 21, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the cross motion of defendant Safeway Environmental Corporation for summary judgment dismissing defendant Big Apple Wrecking and Construction Company's cross claim against it for contractual indemnification and granted Big Apple's cross motion for partial summary judgment on its cross claim against Safeway for contractual indemnification to the extent of finding that Safeway, its agents or subcontractors are liable for plaintiff's injuries, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The indemnification clause in dispute provides indemnity only to the extent of loss caused by the negligent acts of the subcontractor and/or its agents and is, therefore, enforceable under General Obligations Law § 5-322.1 [1] (see, Itri Brick & Concrete Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 N.Y.2d 786, 795, n.5, 658 N.Y.S.2d 903, 680 N.E.2d 1200).
Having failed to file a notice of appeal, Big Apple's argument that the record demonstrates it was not negligent is not properly before this Court. Accordingly, the court's conditional grant of summary judgment pending a finding as to the extent of Safeway's responsibility for the loss was proper.
We have considered Safeway's remaining arguments and find them to be unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 23, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)