Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher BYRNE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey M. Atlas, J.), rendered April 14, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3 to 6 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
Regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, his claims are reviewable to the extent they affect the voluntariness of his plea (see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 10, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022 [1989] ). However, since defendant did not move to withdraw his plea, and since this case does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 [1988] ), his challenge to the validity of his plea is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would conclude that defendant's plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, and that there was nothing in the plea allocution that cast significant doubt on his guilt (see People v. Seeber, 4 N.Y.3d 780, 793 N.Y.S.2d 826, 826 N.E.2d 797 [2005]; People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160 [1995] ). The court's discussion of defendant's possible sentencing exposure in the event of a conviction after trial was not coercive (see e.g. People v. Pagan, 297 A.D.2d 582, 747 N.Y.S.2d 174 [2002], lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 562, 754 N.Y.S.2d 215, 784 N.E.2d 88 [2002] ). Although, at sentencing, defendant asserted his innocence, he did not move to withdraw the plea, and there was no reason for the court to conduct a further inquiry (see e.g. People v. Riley, 264 A.D.2d 689, 695 N.Y.S.2d 354 [1999], lv. denied 94 N.Y.2d 906, 707 N.Y.S.2d 391, 728 N.E.2d 990 [2000] ).
We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims, including his meritless request for resentencing to “time served.”
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 06, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)