PEOPLE v. NEAL (2006)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Larry NEAL, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: April 28, 2006

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, KEHOE, AND HAYES, JJ.

Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender, Rochester (James Eckert of Counsel), for Defendant-Appellant. Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Stephen X. O'Brien of Counsel), for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court's determination of his risk level is supported by the requisite clear and convincing evidence (see § 168-n[3] ). The case summary of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders indicates that the victims reported to the police that defendant touched them under their clothing and forced them to engage in sexual contact with either defendant or each other (see generally id.), and defendant does not dispute that he denied responsibility and refused treatment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

MEMORANDUM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network