Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Richard F. LANDOW, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TOWN OF AMHERST, Defendant-Appellant.
Plaintiff commenced this false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution action as a result of his arrest and subsequent criminal prosecution for obstructing governmental administration in the second degree (Penal Law § 195.05). After a nonjury trial, Supreme Court expressly found defendant liable under the false arrest cause of action and implicitly found defendant liable under the false imprisonment cause of action as well, inasmuch as the court awarded plaintiff damages “for the humiliation and embarrassment suffered during the 28 hours or so that he spent in custody.” The court further awarded plaintiff legal fees incurred in the defense of the criminal prosecution. We agree with defendant that the court erred in awarding those legal fees to plaintiff (see Broughton v. State of New York, 37 N.Y.2d 451, 459, 373 N.Y.S.2d 87, 335 N.E.2d 310, cert. denied sub nom. Schanbarger v. Kellogg, 423 U.S. 929, 96 S.Ct. 277, 46 L.Ed.2d 257), and we further agree with defendant that the court erred in assessing the amount of damages to be awarded for false imprisonment based on a period of incarceration of “28 hours or so” because that period included postarraignment incarceration (see id.). Damages resulting from postarraignment incarceration are attributable only to the tort of malicious prosecution, for which the court awarded no damages (see Williams v. Moore, 197 A.D.2d 511, 514, 602 N.Y.S.2d 199). Consequently, we modify the judgment accordingly, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court to determine the amount of damages to be awarded for false imprisonment consistent with this decision.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the amount of damages awarded and the award of legal fees and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 28, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)