Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Errol MACKLIN, a/k/a Alvin Smith, Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic Massaro, J.), entered April 20, 1999, which denied defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court and Justice, rendered March 13, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of rape in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.
While we agree with defendant that his motion contained non-record factual allegations that could not have been made on direct appeal, we find that the motion was properly denied. Defendant's allegations, some of which were made solely by defendant, were contradicted by his counsel, and which, we find, could not possibly be true (see, CPL 440.30[4][d] ), do not establish ineffective assistance of trial counsel (see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584; People v. Hobot, 84 N.Y.2d 1021, 1024, 622 N.Y.S.2d 675, 646 N.E.2d 1102). In particular, we note that, even if true, the affidavits of defendant's mother and brother that defendant was not in the apartment in question between 3:00 and 5:00 A.M. on the night of the incident, after which time they were asleep, and that they informed counsel that they would testify to this fact, were largely irrelevant, since the trial testimony showed that defendant and the complainant could have arrived in the apartment after these relatives retired and without their knowledge.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 29, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)