Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John AVILDSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. Myroslawa PRYSTAY, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, Ann L. Detiere, et al., Non-Party Attorneys/Appellants.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered January 30, 1996, awarding defendant's former attorneys counsel fees, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of remanding the matter for calculation of additional counsel fees due to both non-party attorneys to include counsel fees incurred by defendant in her efforts to obtain child support and in setting aside the initial agreements between the parties including time spent by defense counsel in attempting to obtain counsel fees, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs. The appeal from the order, same court and Justice, entered November 29, 1995, which directed entry of the aforesaid judgment, is unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from such judgment.
In an order entered June 21, 1993, defendant was awarded compensatory damages in the amount of her legal fees as well as $225,000 for her pain and suffering and loss of earnings resulting from plaintiff's bad faith, malicious prosecution of this action. The IAS court (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), concluded, as a matter of law, that “[d]efendant is entitled to recover the cost of all her legal fees in this litigation” (emphasis added) and ordered a reference on “[t]he amount of attorney's fees incurred by defendant over the years.” That order was unanimously affirmed by this court (204 A.D.2d 154, 611 N.Y.S.2d 188). Thus, the declaration of entitlement was fixed as of that date and all that remained was the calculation of the specific amount of attorneys' fees due. Such calculation should include an award for the time reasonably spent in attempting to obtain those attorneys fees.
We have considered the parties' remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 06, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)