Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Omran FEILI, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered April 25, 1995, which, inter alia, denied defendants' cross motion for a protective order limiting questioning at deposition concerning certain assertedly confidential investigations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's order, which provides for an in camera review of any assertedly sensitive documents identified at the deposition to determine subsequent particularized objections by defendants to their disclosure, properly balanced the competing interests of the parties at this juncture of the litigation, and was otherwise a proper exercise of discretion (see, Cirale v. 80 Pine St. Corp., 35 N.Y.2d 113, 118-119, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1, 316 N.E.2d 301).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 27, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)