Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Christopher SCOTT, etc., Petitioner, v. Raymond KELLY, etc., et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated December 31, 2001, suspending petitioner from his position as a New York City police officer for fifteen days without pay, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Saralee Evans, J.], entered July 29, 2002), dismissed, without costs.
Respondent's finding that petitioner had used excessive force against an arrestee is supported by substantial evidence, including the testimony of the complainant (see Matter of Wagner v. Kerik, 298 A.D.2d 322, 748 N.Y.S.2d 860). Because disciplinary proceedings against police officers are governed by the Administrative Code of the City of New York, petitioner's contention that he was entitled to notice of the charges and specifications against him in accordance with the requirements of Civil Service Law § 75(4) is unavailing (see Matter of Montella v. Bratton, 93 N.Y.2d 424, 691 N.Y.S.2d 372, 713 N.E.2d 406). Moreover, the limitations imposed by Civil Service Law § 75(4) are expressly inapplicable where an employee is charged with conduct, which if proved in a court of appropriate jurisdiction would constitute a crime, and the conduct with which petitioner was charged would, if proved in court, constitute a crime. Finally, the penalty imposed is not shocking to our sense of fairness (see Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 39-40, 724 N.Y.S.2d 680, 747 N.E.2d 1280).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 20, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)