Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Billy CHATELAIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J. at suppression hearing; John Cataldo, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered January 4, 2007, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of 4 1/212 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Defendant's arguments that the arresting officer should have issued a summons rather than arresting defendant and conducting a search incident to that arrest are unpreserved (see People v. Tutt, 38 N.Y.2d 1011 [1976] ), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits. Having observed defendant drive a vehicle with a suspended license (see Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 509[1]; 511[1][a] ), the officer had probable cause to arrest him, and we conclude that issuance of a summons would not have been a practicable alternative to arrest (see People v. Troiano, 35 N.Y.2d 476, 478 [1974]; People v. Peterson, 245 A.D.2d 815, 817 [1997] ).
Defendant's contention that the police improperly searched a closed bag contained in defendant's pants at the time of his arrest is also unpreserved (see People v. Colon, 46 A.D.3d 260, 263 [2007] ), and we likewise decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject defendant's claim on the merits since the bag was in his grabbable area and the circumstances justified inspection of the bag's contents (see People v. Smith, 59 N.Y.2d 454 [1983]; People v. Wylie, 244 A.D.2d 247 [1997], lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 946 [1998] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 22, 2009
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)