Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Demetrius BELL, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), rendered March 21, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 14 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The police had probable cause to arrest defendant based on information obtained from eyewitnesses and the subsequent investigation (see People v. Rodriquez, 254 A.D.2d 181, 679 N.Y.S.2d 590 [1998], lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 985, 683 N.Y.S.2d 766, 706 N.E.2d 754 [1998] ). The arresting officer heard a radio transmission describing a car and its occupants, giving the direction they were heading, and stating that defendant, one of the occupants, was wanted in connection with a homicide. Once the officer observed and recognized defendant in a vehicle which matched the description given in the radio transmission, he was entitled under the fellow officer rule to arrest defendant (see People v. Ketcham, 93 N.Y.2d 416, 690 N.Y.S.2d 874, 712 N.E.2d 1238 [1999] ).
The court properly denied defendant's request for a charge on the defense of temporary and lawful possession since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to defendant (People v. Steele, 26 N.Y.2d 526, 529, 311 N.Y.S.2d 889, 260 N.E.2d 527 [1970] ), to support such a charge. Even under defendant's version of the events, his conduct was “utterly at odds with any claim of innocent possession” (People v. Williams, 50 N.Y.2d 1043, 1045, 431 N.Y.S.2d 698, 409 N.E.2d 1372 [1980]; see also People v. Snyder, 73 N.Y.2d 900, 901–02, 539 N.Y.S.2d 285, 536 N.E.2d 614 [1989] ).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2375, 1408 /03
Decided: December 20, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)