Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J. at suppression hearing and colloquy relating to counsel; Michael A. Corriero, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered June 15, 2005, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 1/212 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 [1987] ). The evidence supported the conclusion that defendant transferred an object to an apprehended buyer, and that the object contained cocaine.
Even assuming that, at the suppression hearing, defendant made an implicit request for assignment of new counsel, we conclude that the hearing court properly denied it. There was a series of colloquies during which defendant had ample opportunity to establish good cause for such a substitution but failed to do so (see People v. Linares, 2 N.Y.3d 507, 510, 780 N.Y.S.2d 529, 813 N.E.2d 609 [2004]; People v. Beriguette, 84 N.Y.2d 978, 622 N.Y.S.2d 497, 646 N.E.2d 799 [1994]; People v. Sides, 75 N.Y.2d 822, 552 N.Y.S.2d 555, 551 N.E.2d 1233 [1990] ). Defendant's implicit request was supported by nothing more than his unjustified lack of confidence in his attorney (see People v. Morris, 21 A.D.3d 251, 800 N.Y.S.2d 6 [2005], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 831, 804 N.Y.S.2d 45, 837 N.E.2d 744 [2005] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 31, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)