Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Wendy L. WOLEBEN, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Marilyn J. Noftsker, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pragna B. SUTARIA, M.D., et al., Defendants, Thomas L. Greer, M.D., Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for the personal injuries sustained by Marilyn J. Noftsker and her wrongful death, which allegedly were caused by acts of medical malpractice on the part of defendants. We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of Thomas L. Greer, M.D. (defendant) seeking dismissal of the complaint against him on the ground of improper service of process. Defendant failed to move to dismiss the complaint against him on that ground within 60 days after having served an answer setting forth an objection to service and thus waived that objection (see B.N. Realty Assoc. v. Lichtenstein, 21 A.D.3d 793, 796, 801 N.Y.S.2d 271; Dimond v. Verdon, 5 A.D.3d 718, 719, 773 N.Y.S.2d 603; Aretakis v. Tarantino, 300 A.D.2d 160, 751 N.Y.S.2d 481). We further agree with plaintiff that defendant did not demonstrate the requisite “undue hardship” to justify the extension of defendant's time for moving to dismiss the action on the ground of improper service (CPLR 3211 [e]; see B.N. Realty Assoc., 21 A.D.3d at 796-797, 801 N.Y.S.2d 271; State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Firmstone, 18 A.D.3d 900, 902, 795 N.Y.S.2d 118; Worldcom, Inc. v. Dialing Loving Care, 269 A.D.2d 159, 702 N.Y.S.2d 76).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied, the complaint against defendant Thomas L. Greer, M.D. is reinstated and the second affirmative defense insofar as it concerns that defendant is dismissed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 17, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)