Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of PYRAMID COMPANY OF WATERTOWN and Salmon Run Shopping Center, LLC, Petitioners-Respondents, v. PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF WATERTOWN, Thomas Boxberger and Pamela Desormo, as Co-Chairpersons of Planning Board of Town of Watertown, Durwood Cook, as Zoning Enforcement Officer of Town of Watertown, Respondents-Respondents, COR Route 3 Company, LLC, Stark Family Partnership, LP, Respondents-Appellants, et al., Respondent. Bed, Bath and Beyond, Inc. and Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Intervenors-Appellants.
Respondents COR Route 3 Company, LLC (COR) and Stark Family Partnership, LP (Stark) and the two intervenors herein appeal from an order that held COR and Stark in contempt of this Court's order in which we reversed the judgment of Supreme Court and granted the amended petition in part by annulling the determination of respondent Planning Board of the Town of Watertown (Matter of Pyramid Co. of Watertown v. Planning Bd. of Town of Watertown, 24 A.D.3d 1312, 807 N.Y.S.2d 243, lv. dismissed 7 N.Y.3d 803, 821 N.Y.S.2d 810, 854 N.E.2d 1274). Because the contempt has been purged pursuant to the provisions of the contempt order and petitioners have waived the fine imposed in the contempt order, the appellants are no longer aggrieved and the issues raised on these appeals therefore are moot (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876). This case does not fall within any exception to the mootness doctrine (see id. at 714-715, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876).
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 17, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)