Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of the FORECLOSURE OF TAX LIENS BY PROCEEDING IN REM PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 11 OF REAL PROPERTY TAX LAW BY COUNTY OF HERKIMER. County of Herkimer, Petitioner-Respondent; Terry R. Jones, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Respondent Terry R. Jones (Jones) failed to establish a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear in this tax foreclosure proceeding and thus County Court properly denied his motion to vacate the default judgment of foreclosure and to set aside any deeds related to the subject property (see generally NYCTL 1997-1 Trust v. Vila, 19 A.D.3d 382, 796 N.Y.S.2d 138). The evidence submitted by petitioner's tax enforcement officer established that a notice of the foreclosure was sent to Jones by certified mail at his last known address, and that someone with the last name of Jones acknowledged delivery of that notice. The tax enforcement officer also stated in her affidavit that other notices of the impending foreclosure were sent to Jones by regular mail at that address, and none was returned by the post office. That evidence is sufficient to give rise to the presumption that the notice was received, and the mere denial of receipt of the notice, without more, is insufficient to rebut the presumption (see Johnson v. County of Erie, 309 A.D.2d 1278, 765 N.Y.S.2d 557; 114 Aldrich v. City of Buffalo, 216 A.D.2d 932, 629 N.Y.S.2d 146). The contention of Jones that he was denied due process by the procedure employed to provide notice of the impending foreclosure is without merit (see generally Matter of Harner v. County of Tioga, 5 N.Y.3d 136, 140-141, 800 N.Y.S.2d 112, 833 N.E.2d 255; Kennedy v. Mossafa, 100 N.Y.2d 1, 759 N.Y.S.2d 429, 789 N.E.2d 607).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 17, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)