Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: John G. GELLENE, an attorney. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, John G. Gellene, Respondent.
Respondent John G. Gellene was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on March 26, 1990. On March 3, 1998, he was convicted, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, of two counts of bankruptcy fraud (18 U.S.C. § 152) and one count of false sworn declaration (18 U.S.C. § 1623), both of which are felonies under the United States Code.
By petition dated May 1, 1998, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b), which provides for automatic disbarment where an attorney has been convicted of a felony in this State or elsewhere, so long as the underlying conduct constitutes a felony in this State. Respondent's convictions for bankruptcy fraud and false sworn declaration are similar, respectively, to the crimes of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony under Penal Law § 175.35 (see, Matter of Knoll, 181 A.D.2d 136, 586 N.Y.S.2d 73), and perjury in the first degree, a class D felony under Penal Law § 210.15 (see, Matter of DeSalvo, 189 A.D.2d 322, 597 N.Y.S.2d 2). On the basis of his convictions, respondent consents to the petition.
Accordingly, the petition to strike respondent's name from the roll of attorneys in this State is granted, and respondent's name is so stricken effective immediately.
PER CURIAM.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 30, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)