Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FRONTIER WAREHOUSING, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Matter of Advanced Distribution Systems, Inc., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Regional Integrated Logistics, Inc., Doing Business as Frontier Warehousing, Respondent-Respondent.
Advanced Distribution Systems, Inc. (ADS) commenced an action against defendant, Frontier Warehousing, Inc. (Frontier), and thereafter obtained a default judgment against it. In an attempt to execute on that judgment, ADS commenced a supplementary proceeding seeking to attach the proceeds due under a promissory note issued to Frontier by respondent, Regional Integrated Logistics, Inc., doing business as Frontier Warehousing. Frontier appeals from an order that, inter alia, determined that ADS is entitled to attach the proceeds due under the note to the extent necessary to satisfy the judgment. We conclude that the appeal must be dismissed. Frontier assigned its rights under the note before the order that is the subject of this appeal was issued. Because Frontier “had no interest in the [proceeds of the note] at the time the order [on appeal] was issued or during the statutory period for filing a notice of appeal, it was not an ‘aggrieved party’ within the purview of CPLR 5511 and [thus] lack[s] standing to appeal” (Jacob & Valeria Langeloth Found. v. Dickerson Pond Assoc., 149 A.D.2d 408, 409, 540 N.Y.S.2d 17; see Matter of Paolercio v. D J A Assoc., 273 A.D.2d 392, 710 N.Y.S.2d 923).
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 17, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)