Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of the Trust Created Under the Last WILL and Testament OF Ellsworth M. STATLER, Deceased, and the Indenture. William J. Cunningham, Jr., Trustee, Statler Foundation, Petitioner-Respondent; Marguerite Collesano, Trustee, Statler Foundation, Respondent-Appellant; Joseph DiNardo and Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Respondents-Respondents. Bernard A. Tolbert, Trustee, Statler Foundation, and Arthur F. DuC. Musarra, Trustee, Statler Foundation, Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.)
With respect to the order in appeal No. 1, we conclude that the Surrogate did not err in exercising her discretion under SCPA 1502 and the 1934 Indenture of Trust (Indenture) in appointing a successor to the trustee who resigned (see Matter of Statler's Will, 81 N.Y.S.2d 916, 918-919, affd. 276 App.Div. 818, 93 N.Y.S.2d 709, 710, affd. 301 N.Y. 645, 93 N.E.2d 921). The Surrogate's authority to appoint a successor is established by paragraph Eighth of the Indenture, which states that, “[i]n case of the ․ resignation ․ of any Trustee hereunder, the Surrogate ․ may from time to time designate and appoint a successor Trustee or Trustees so that there shall at all times be at least three trustees qualified and acting hereunder.” We further conclude that, even absent an application for appointment of a successor trustee, the Surrogate has the authority under the Indenture to appoint one or more trustees to replace a single resignor and thereby maintain the total number of trustees at more than three. The Surrogate's exercise of that authority did not “contravene the express terms of the” Indenture (SCPA 1502[2] ). We cannot construe the Indenture as providing that the Surrogate has the authority to act only if the number of trustees falls below three. Rather, the Indenture sets a minimum and not a maximum with respect to the number of trustees who should serve at any given time.
We conclude with respect to the order in appeal No. 2 that, in view of the factors set forth in Matter of Greatsinger, 67 N.Y.2d 177, 183-184, 501 N.Y.S.2d 623, 492 N.E.2d 751, the Surrogate did not abuse her discretion in denying the request of petitioner, a trustee, seeking reimbursement from the trust for the amount of counsel fees incurred in opposing the Surrogate's appointment of a successor trustee (see id. at 181, 501 N.Y.S.2d 623, 492 N.E.2d 751; see generally SCPA 2301[2], [4]; 2302[6] ).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 17, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)