Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Rhonda J. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her, upon her plea of guilty, of two counts of felony driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192[2], [3]; § 1193[1][c][ii] ) and one count of failure to keep right (§ 1120[a] ). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court properly determined that the police were justified in stopping the motor vehicle that she was driving and thus properly denied her suppression motion. The police may lawfully stop a vehicle when they have “probable cause to believe that the driver of [a vehicle] has committed a traffic violation” (People v. Robinson, 97 N.Y.2d 341, 349, 741 N.Y.S.2d 147, 767 N.E.2d 638; see People v. Washburn, 309 A.D.2d 1270, 1271, 765 N.Y.S.2d 76), and they may lawfully stop a vehicle “when there exists at least a reasonable suspicion that the driver or occupants of the vehicle have committed, are committing, or are about to commit a crime” (People v. Spencer, 84 N.Y.2d 749, 753, 622 N.Y.S.2d 483, 646 N.E.2d 785, cert. denied 516 U.S. 905, 116 S.Ct. 271, 133 L.Ed.2d 192). Here, the evidence at the suppression hearing established that the police observed defendant's commission of a traffic violation and in addition had a reasonable suspicion that defendant was committing the crime of driving while intoxicated (cf. Washburn, 309 A.D.2d at 1271, 765 N.Y.S.2d 76).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed and the matter is remitted to Cattaraugus County Court for proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 17, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)