Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert P. YARDLEY and Janet L. Yardley, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Kenneth J. AASERUD, Defendant-Appellant.
Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries they sustained when Robert P. Yardley (plaintiff) “put down” the motorcycle on which they were riding to avoid colliding with a truck driven by defendant, who allegedly failed to yield the right of way and started to turn left in front of plaintiffs' motorcycle. Defendant counterclaimed against plaintiff, alleging that plaintiff's negligence caused or contributed to the accident. Plaintiff, individually, moved for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim and plaintiffs, jointly, moved for partial summary judgment on liability. Supreme Court granted the respective motions, and defendant appeals.
We conclude that the appeal must be dismissed because defendant failed to include in the record on appeal documents that were submitted in support of the motions (see Whyte v. Destra, 298 A.D.2d 384, 385, 751 N.Y.S.2d 391; see also Wright v. Rite Aid of N.Y. [Appeal No. 2], 288 A.D.2d 834, 836, 732 N.Y.S.2d 498). In support of his motion for summary judgment, plaintiff submitted an affidavit from a claims adjuster. Although the affidavit states that transcripts of two interviews with eyewitnesses are attached, the attachments are not in the record on appeal. That affidavit, as well as the attached exhibits, was incorporated by reference into plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment. In the absence of those exhibits, we cannot review defendant's contentions.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed with costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 02, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)