Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Tracy McDONALD and Romaine Jackson, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Shaquanna Jackson, Deceased, Tracy McDonald, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Lakisha Moye, an Infant, and Ferman Moye, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. FINLEY'S INC., Finley Cooperwood, John Miller, Defendants-Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Plaintiffs Tracy McDonald and Romaine Jackson, individually and as administrators of the estate of their infant daughter, Shaquanna Jackson, plaintiff Tracy McDonald, individually and as parent and natural guardian of Lakisha Moye, and Ferman Moye commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries and the wrongful death of Shaquanna resulting from a fire at their residence. The expert, a fire investigator hired by Finley's Inc., Finley Cooperwood and John Miller (defendants), was able to conduct an investigation prior to the demolition of the building two days after the fire, but plaintiffs' expert had no such opportunity.
Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' cross motion insofar as it sought an oral examination of defendants' expert, limited to his factual findings (see Flex-O-Vit USA v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 281 A.D.2d 980, 722 N.Y.S.2d 671; Tedesco v. Dry-Vac Sales, 203 A.D.2d 873, 874, 611 N.Y.S.2d 321). The court erred, however, in granting the cross motion insofar as it sought an unredacted report prepared by defendants' expert. Plaintiffs are entitled to factual data and test results contained in the expert's report, but not those parts of the report containing the expert's opinions (see Perfido v. Messina, 125 A.D.2d 654, 510 N.Y.S.2d 13; Stevens v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth., 117 A.D.2d 733, 498 N.Y.S.2d 459). We therefore modify the order accordingly.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the cross motion in part and providing that defendants Finley's Inc., Finley Cooperwood and John Miller shall disclose the report of their fire investigator with his opinions redacted and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 01, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)