Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Charles J. FLYNN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gregory B. OLMA, David A. Franczyk, William J. Reece, Robert J. Blazina, Dennis J. Boyle, James M. Dee, Thomas J. Christy, Ronald J. Pilozzi, Richard Clark, Lucy Tretiak Caruso, Gerhardt J. Yaskow, John W. Greenan, Kevin R. Hardwick, Salvatore P. Dicembre, Karen E. Balone, Robert W. Pietrocarlo, Bob Brewer, Shelly Collora Schratz, Jane S. Woodward, Gerald E. Paradise, III, Eugene P. Czyz, Sr., Martin E. Rosiek, Richard W. Herniman, Terri J. Kloiber, Mary A. Clark, Kenneth E. Martin, Janet L. Vogtli, John N. Cardarelli, Edward Krycia, Jr., Bill Cirocco, Deborah J. Skulski, Mary S. Cooke, Michael E. Heftka, Karl F. Kofod, Timothy R. Straube, Georgette F. Pelletterie, Douglas P. Szary, Keith V. Dillingham, Harold L. Finger, Thomas R. George, Stanley A. Jemiolo, Jr., David H. Rider, Joseph M. Shiah, Raymond E. Sinclair, Kevin A. Shelley, Donald J. Larson, Joseph H. Lukasiewicz, Sr., Richard L. Reese, Jr., James B. Ebersole, John G. Hedges, Dorothy L. Bycina, Kevin D. Walsh, Becky Jo Summers, Mary E. Bolt, Dawn D. Izydorczak, Christa L. Dake, William L. Kindel, Peggy M. Cooke, Samuel J. Chiavetta, Jr., Charles T. Nuttle, Mary A. Stelley, Gerald R. Barry, Donald C. Holmes, Gerald F. Summe, John J. Mills, Anthony L. Orsini, Jr., Louis P. Corrigan, Jr., and Laurence F. Adamczyk and Ralph M. Mohr, as Commissioners of Elections and Constituting Erie County Board of Elections, Respondents-Respondents.
Petitioner commenced this special proceeding seeking to invalidate the designating petitions and authorizations filed on behalf of respondent candidates for the Independence Party primary election to be held on September 11, 2001 (see, Election Law § 6-120[3] ). A challenge to the election of officers at a party committee meeting must be brought within 10 days after the meeting is held (see, Election Law § 16-102[2] ). Here, chairpersons of competing factions within the party were elected at competing organizational meetings held on November 7, 2000, and neither faction challenged the organizational meeting of the other within the 10-day time limitation. Supreme Court therefore properly dismissed the petition as time-barred (see, Matter of Valin v. Adamczyk, 286 A.D.2d 566, 730 N.Y.S.2d 464 [2001] ).
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 22, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)