Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Petitioner, v. DOM'S WHOLESALE AND RETAIL CENTER, INC., et al., Respondents.
Application pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to enforce petitioner's order, dated June 3, 1999, as revised by its order dated August 26, 2003, finding that the complainant suffered mental anguish and humiliation as a result of a hostile work environment caused and allowed to exist by respondents, and awarding the complainant $20,000 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Harold B. Beeler, J.], entered January 28, 2004), unanimously granted, without costs.
The record, based on the complainant's unrefuted allegations, evinces sufficient evidence of a hostile work environment created by same-sex harassment (see Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., 523 U.S. 75, 118 S.Ct. 998, 140 L.Ed.2d 201 [1998] ), amounting to constructive termination of employment (Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v. ARC XVI Inwood, 17 A.D.3d 239, 796 N.Y.S.2d 238 [2005] ). The matter is distinguishable from Yukoweic v. International Bus. Machs., 228 A.D.2d 775, 643 N.Y.S.2d 747 [1996], lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 816, 651 N.Y.S.2d 17, 673 N.E.2d 1244 [1996] in that here the purportedly crude humor or horseplay targeted the complainant and was gender-specific. The complainant was a member of a protected class, a hostile work environment was created by respondent co-worker's harassment, and respondent owner failed, upon notification, to take corrective action, and indeed acquiesced in the offending conduct (see Matter of State Div. of Human Rights [Greene] v. St. Elizabeth's Hosp., 66 N.Y.2d 684, 496 N.Y.S.2d 411, 487 N.E.2d 268 [1985] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 19, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)