Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Elihu FIER, an attorney and counselor-at-law: Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Elihu Fier, Esq., Respondent.
Respondent Elihu Fier was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on December 17, 1958, and at all times relevant to this proceeding has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
In connection with statements made to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding tax payment discrepancies, respondent was found guilty, after a jury trial in the United States Court for the Southern District of New York, of two counts of making false statements in violation of 18 USC § 1001, for which he was sentenced to probation and a $5,000 fine. The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law 90[4][a], on the ground that he was automatically disbarred as a result of his conviction of a Federal felony that would constitute a felony if committed under New York law. A violation of 18 USC § 1001 is analogous to the New York felony of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (Penal Law § 175.35; Matter of Walker, 257 A.D.2d 315, 688 N.Y.S.2d 146; Matter of Fanta, 242 A.D.2d 172, 674 N.Y.S.2d 293). The present Federal charges are “essentially similar” to conduct proscribed under the New York statute (Matter of Margiotta, 60 N.Y.2d 147, 149, 468 N.Y.S.2d 857, 456 N.E.2d 798), especially insofar as respondent, by knowingly altering his check, knowingly created a written statement containing false information that he then proffered to the IRS in order to deceive, and thus defraud, the government agency (see, Matter of Silverblatt, 113 A.D.2d 1, 494 N.Y.S.2d 864; Matter of Marilao, 188 A.D.2d 146, 148-149, 594 N.Y.S.2d 753 appeal dismissed 82 N.Y.2d 747, 602 N.Y.S.2d 805, 622 N.E.2d 306), constituting an analog of the New York felony.
Accordingly, the petition to strike his name from the roll of attorneys should be granted.
Petition granted and the name of respondent stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, as indicated.
All concur.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 12, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)