Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David SIZE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Earl A. SIZE, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered May 16, 2000, which denied defendant's cross motion to dismiss plaintiff's cause of action, for imposition of a constructive trust, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) and (7), unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Defendant is plaintiff's natural father. In 1956, plaintiff was adopted by his stepfather and plaintiff and defendant had no contact with each other for 30 years. However, in 1986, the two began communicating, and exchanging visits with each other. In 1987, they entered into an oral agreement whereby defendant executed a mortgage and took legal title to a condominium apartment and plaintiff provided the down payment and agreed to make the mortgage payments while he resided within the apartment. Subsequently, defendant attempted to sell the apartment and plaintiff commenced the instant action seeking a declaratory judgment that he is the beneficial owner of the apartment and for imposition of a constructive trust.
The IAS court properly denied defendant's cross motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action since plaintiff sufficiently alleged the elements for imposition of a constructive trust, including the existence of a confidential or fiduciary relationship, a promise, a transfer in reliance thereon, and unjust enrichment (see, Sharp v. Kosmalski, 40 N.Y.2d 119, 121, 386 N.Y.S.2d 72, 351 N.E.2d 721). The action was also properly sustained as against that branch of defendant's cross motion seeking to dismiss the action as time-barred. Plaintiff's cause of action for a constructive trust did not accrue until defendant attempted to evict plaintiff from the apartment for the purpose of selling the unit, which event occurred within six years of the commencement of the action (see, Lucci v. Lucci, 227 A.D.2d 387, 642 N.Y.S.2d 326).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 12, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)