Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: QUINCY Y., et al., Children Alleged to be Abused. Denise Y., Respondent-Appellant, Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about November 19, 1996, which, upon fact-finding determinations of direct and derivative abuse, placed respondent's son, Quincy Y., with the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of 12 months and placed respondent's daughter, Destiny Y., with her father for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, as to the fact-finding determinations, and the remainder of the appeals, respecting the disposition of the children, unanimously dismissed, as academic, all without costs.
A preponderance of the credible evidence established that respondent abused her daughter, Destiny, who sustained a severe and inadequately explained second-degree head burn while in respondent's care (see Family Court Act § 1046(a)(ii); Matter of Philip M., 82 N.Y.2d 238, 243-244, 604 N.Y.S.2d 40, 624 N.E.2d 168; Matter of Jorge S., 211 A.D.2d 513, 621 N.Y.S.2d 66, lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 810, 629 N.Y.S.2d 724, 653 N.E.2d 620). The finding of abuse with respect to Destiny is additionally warranted by respondent's failure to seek prompt medical attention for Destiny, which omission required Destiny's hospitalization for a period of weeks when the untreated burn became infected.
Also proper under the circumstances of this case was the derivative finding of abuse with respect to respondent's son Quincy. Proof of physical injury was not necessary as to the directly abused child's sibling (see, Family Court Act § 1046(a)(i); Matter of Jorela L., 222 A.D.2d 282, 283, 635 N.Y.S.2d 584).
Respondent's challenge to the placements directed in the appealed order is academic since the one-year term of those placements has expired and subsequent orders extending the children's placements have been entered (see, Matter of Angelina E., 213 A.D.2d 346, 347, 624 N.Y.S.2d 419; Matter of Jorge S., supra ).
On the totality of the existing record, it is clear that respondent received effective assistance of counsel in this matter.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 26, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)