Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, Jay A. Kranis, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BURGER KING CORP., et al., Defendants-Respondents, Hydro Dynamics of America, Corp., Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered November 20, 2003, which granted the cross motion by defendants A.J. Development and Lund Fire Products for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress, and order, same court and Justice, entered February 4, 2005, which granted motions by the Burger King defendants dismissing the same cause of action, and by defendant 250-254 West 82nd Street Owners for summary judgment dismissing causes of action for breach of lease and negligent infliction of emotional distress, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Kranis plaintiffs had no viable cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress arising out of the negligent destruction of their property where there is no claim that plaintiffs themselves were in any physical danger (see Curbean v. Kibel, 12 A.D.3d 206, 784 N.Y.S.2d 518 [2004]; Golden v. Manhasset Condominium, 2 A.D.3d 345, 346, 770 N.Y.S.2d 55 [2003]; Probst v. Cacoulidis, 295 A.D.2d 331, 332, 743 N.Y.S.2d 509 [2002] ). The claimed exacerbation of plaintiffs' preexisting medical conditions, caused by displacement from their home for nine months, is a consequential-not a direct-result of any negligence, and is therefore not compensable (see Kennedy v. McKesson Co., 58 N.Y.2d 500, 506, 462 N.Y.S.2d 421, 448 N.E.2d 1332 [1983]; Probst, 295 A.D.2d at 332, 743 N.Y.S.2d 509).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 24, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)