PEOPLE GOLDBERG v. WARDEN (2007)

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Thomas Farber, J.), entered February 10, 2006, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

 As petitioner is no longer in the custody of respondent Warden and could not be immediately released, the remedy of habeas corpus is unavailable (see People ex rel. Brown v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole, 70 N.Y.2d 391, 398, 521 N.Y.S.2d 657, 516 N.E.2d 194 [1987] ).   Nevertheless, this proceeding is not moot because, inter alia, it affects parole time credited to petitioner.   Therefore, we consider the matter as a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see CPLR 103[c] ).

 The petition was properly denied on the ground that the preliminary parole revocation hearing was timely scheduled for November 28, 2005, and was adjourned for the legitimate reason that petitioner was confined for medical reasons (see People ex rel. Moore v. Warden, 36 A.D.3d 494, 829 N.Y.S.2d 45 [2007] ).   Respondent Division of Parole also acted “energetically and scrupulously” in rescheduling the hearing for December 5, 2005, when it learned of petitioner's release from that confinement (see People ex rel. Burley v. Warden, 70 A.D.2d 518, 519, 415 N.Y.S.2d 871 [1979], lv. denied 48 N.Y.2d 602, 421 N.Y.S.2d 1026, 396 N.E.2d 205), and petitioner has not cited any prejudice from the short delay.