Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Katherine M. MICHAELS, Respondent-Appellant.
Petitioner, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide), commenced this proceeding seeking a permanent or temporary stay of arbitration arising from a demand for arbitration of supplemental uninsured motorist benefits. Supreme Court (Vincent E. Doyle, J.) denied the petition for a permanent stay but granted a temporary stay for 60 days to complete discovery. Thereafter, respondent moved for an order disqualifying the arbitrator and appointing a neutral arbitrator. Supreme Court (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.) properly denied the motion. A court has the inherent power to disqualify an arbitrator before an award has been rendered where there is a real possibility that injustice will result (see Matter of Astoria Med. Group [Health Ins. Plan of Greater N.Y.], 11 N.Y.2d 128, 132, 227 N.Y.S.2d 401, 182 N.E.2d 85; Matter of County of Niagara v. Bania, 6 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 775 N.Y.S.2d 744; Rabinowitz v. Olewski, 100 A.D.2d 539, 540, 473 N.Y.S.2d 232). “The proper standard of review for the disqualification of arbitrators is whether the arbitration process is free of the appearance of bias” (Rabinowitz, 100 A.D.2d at 540, 473 N.Y.S.2d 232). Here, there is no evidentiary proof of any appearance of bias on the part of the assigned arbitrator (see Matter of Kornit [Plainview-Old Bethpage Cent. School Dist.], 49 N.Y.2d 842, 843, 427 N.Y.S.2d 786, 404 N.E.2d 1327). There is no allegation that there was a relationship between the arbitrator and Nationwide that could create a conflict of interest (see County of Niagara, 6 A.D.3d at 1225, 775 N.Y.S.2d 744). Respondent alleges only that certain rulings of the arbitrator establish partiality on the part of the arbitrator in favor of insurers, but those allegations are insufficient to establish actual bias or the appearance of bias (see id.). We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 22, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)