PEOPLE v. MAYHAM (2000)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Cassandra MAYHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: May 10, 2000

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., HAYES, SCUDDER and KEHOE, JJ.

Roland Hayes, Buffalo, for Defendant-Appellant. Don I. Dally, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[2] ), defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. Contrary to the People's contention, defendant's waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass the challenge to the severity of the sentence because defendant was not advised of the potential periods of incarceration (see, People v. Cormack, 269 A.D.2d 815, 703 N.Y.S.2d 808; People v. Barker, 266 A.D.2d 846, 698 N.Y.S.2d 805; People v. Wynn, 262 A.D.2d 1052, 691 N.Y.S.2d 807). We conclude, however, that the sentence imposed, six months of incarceration and five years of probation, is not unduly harsh or severe.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

MEMORANDUM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network