Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Stacy L. CALABRESE, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Robert E. JOHNSTON, Respondent-Appellant.
Family Court erred in denying objections of respondent, a self-employed businessman, to an order of the Hearing Examiner that determined his income to be $57,367 for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation. The Hearing Examiner failed to set forth the basis for her determination of respondent's income, i.e, whether business expenses were considered or income was imputed to respondent, and the record does not otherwise reflect the basis for the Hearing Examiner's determination of respondent's income. The court nevertheless denied respondent's objections to the Hearing Examiner's order, and determined that depreciation, mortgage interest payments and maintenance and repair expenses could not be deducted from respondent's income in calculating respondent's child support obligation. Depreciation is not an out-of-pocket expense, and thus the court properly determined that depreciation was not deductible (see, Matter of Barber v. Cahill, 240 A.D.2d 887, 888-889, 658 N.Y.S.2d 738). Mortgage interest payments and maintenance and repair expenses are deductible business expenses, however, and there is no evidence that respondent did not make those payments or incur those expenses. Thus, the court erred in determining that those payments and expenses could not be deducted from respondent's income (see, Matter of Barber v. Cahill, supra, at 889, 658 N.Y.S.2d 738). Based on the absence of findings of fact by either the Hearing Examiner or the court, we are unable to review the propriety of the Hearing Examiner's determination of respondent's income. We therefore reverse the order, grant the objections in part, vacate the order of the Hearing Examiner and remit the matter to Ontario County Family Court for further proceedings on the petition.
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, objections granted in part, order of Hearing Examiner vacated and matter remitted to Ontario County Family Court for further proceedings on the petition.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 07, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)