Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: KIMBERLY C., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Angela C., et al., Respondents-Appellants, The Children's Aid Society, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. Hoffman, J.), entered on or about July 26, 2005, which, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated appellants' parental rights to the subject child and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence supported the determination that the parents permanently neglected the subject child by failing to plan for her future despite the agency's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b[7][a]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984]; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 384-386, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 [1984] ). The record clearly demonstrates that although the parents were aware of the need for, among other things, domestic violence counseling, they stood as an obstacle to such counseling by incredibly and repeatedly denying the need for such intervention (see Matter of Samantha C., 305 A.D.2d 167, 757 N.Y.S.2d 849 [2003], lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 508, 764 N.Y.S.2d 235, 795 N.E.2d 1244 [2003]; Matter of Lamar P., 190 A.D.2d 592, 593 N.Y.S.2d 791 [1993], lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 654, 602 N.Y.S.2d 803, 622 N.E.2d 304 [1993] ). The parents' attendance at counseling programs was insufficient, given their failure to gain insight, accept responsibility and modify their behavior (see Matter of Nathaniel T., 67 N.Y.2d 838, 841-842, 501 N.Y.S.2d 647, 492 N.E.2d 775 [1986] ). Moreover, respondent father failed to complete an alcohol abuse program, denying any problem in the face of clear evidence to the contrary. Finally, despite the agency's diligent scheduling efforts, the parents' visits with the child were, at best, sporadic.
The court properly found that the child's best interests were served by terminating respondents' parental rights, freeing her for adoption by her foster parents, the child's maternal great aunt and uncle, with whom she has lived her entire life. This is especially so where the child will continue to have contact with her natural parents and her siblings, most of whom are cared for by the maternal grandmother (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147-148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 06, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)