Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Donald PRESSLEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Paul Alexander SHNEYER, Defendant-Appellant, Paul A. Shneyer, P.C., Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered July 11, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) to dismiss the complaint as against him in his individual capacity, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff satisfied the burden of establishing personal jurisdiction over defendant by service pursuant to CPLR 308(2). At the traverse hearing, the process server testified that he delivered the summons with notice to a suitable person at defendant's place of business, and that this person accepted the documents before handing them back and directing him to place them in defendant's mailbox (see Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman v. New York Turkey Corp., 111 A.D.2d 93, 489 N.Y.S.2d 226 [1985] ). The process server also stated that the following day he mailed a copy of the summons with notice to defendant's place of business. There is no basis for disturbing the court's findings as to the credibility of the process server (see Schorr v. Persaud, 51 A.D.3d 519, 858 N.Y.S.2d 140 [2008] ). Furthermore, although plaintiff failed to list the individual defendant's name on the mailing envelope, this did not render service on him invalid, since the summons gave ample notice to defendant, an attorney, that he was being sued in his individual capacity (see Albilia v. Hillcrest Gen. Hosp., 124 A.D.2d 499, 508 N.Y.S.2d 10 [1986] ).
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 06, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)