Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
KENNETH D. LAUB & COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES, INC., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered March 22, 2000, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about October 28, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiff's cross motion for reconsideration of an earlier discovery order, unanimously dismissed, as academic, without costs.
The evidence establishes as a matter of law that, in violation of its fiduciary duty, plaintiff broker failed to disclose to defendants, its principals, that it had agreements with third-parties to receive commissions in connection with the leasing of two properties, 383 Madison Avenue and 1271 Avenue of the Americas, which plaintiff was proposing that defendants lease (see, Guice v. Charles Schwab & Co., 89 N.Y.2d 31, 45, 651 N.Y.S.2d 352, 674 N.E.2d 282, cert. denied 520 U.S. 1118, 117 S.Ct. 1250, 137 L.Ed.2d 331). Plaintiff therefore forfeited any right to compensation for its services (see, Murray v. Beard, 102 N.Y. 505, 508, 7 N.E. 553). Although plaintiff asserts that there is a need for further discovery as to whether it had, in fact, disclosed its third-party commission agreements to defendants, we perceive no reason why plaintiff would not itself be in possession of sufficient proof in regard to this issue so as to raise a triable issue of fact.
Were we to reach the issue of the Statute of Frauds, we would find that the oral agreement, as alleged, was capable of being performed within one year, and therefore it fell outside the statute (see, Cron v. Hargro Fabrics, Inc., 91 N.Y.2d 362, 366, 670 N.Y.S.2d 973, 694 N.E.2d 56).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 19, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)