Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Leslie BRANDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aghadjan ELGHANAYAN, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.), entered on or about November 19, 1996, which granted the landlord defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff tenant's complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion as to the first cause of action for negligence, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff alleges that she was raped and beaten by the only other resident of the building, an employee of defendants, after all other apartments had been vacated. Plaintiff's theory that defendants should be held responsible because they negligently hired the employee was rejected by the IAS court for lack of evidence that defendants knew or should have known of the employee's violent propensities. We disagree. For purposes of the motion, plaintiff, single and female, showed that defendants placed a single man, knowing nothing about him and making no apparent effort to obtain references, in an apartment in the building, with written permission to be in plaintiff's apartment to make repairs. Such evidence is sufficient to raise issues of fact as to whether defendants breached a duty owing to plaintiff and whether the attack was foreseeable (see, Rivera v. New York City Tr. Auth., 77 N.Y.2d 322, 329, 567 N.Y.S.2d 629, 569 N.E.2d 432). We do not pass upon the admissibility of the attacker's alleged statement to plaintiff during the attack. Plaintiff's remaining causes of action are without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: August 21, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)