Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
457 MADISON AVENUE CORP., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LEDERER DE PARIS, INC., etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered January 12, 2007, declaring that defendant subtenant was not entitled to exercise its option to extend the term of its sublease with plaintiff net lessee, and awarding damages in favor of plaintiff and against the subtenant and its guarantors, the individual defendants, of $2,112,771.05, representing fixed rent due, additional rent due in the form of real estate tax escalations, operating expense escalations and late charges, and attorneys' fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion court correctly held that the unambiguous no-waiver clause in the sublease eliminated any issues of fact as to whether plaintiff waived its right to the annual increase in fixed rent by not demanding payment thereof for the first five months of the rent year in question (see Jefpaul Garage Corp. v. Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y., 61 N.Y.2d 442, 446, 474 N.Y.S.2d 458, 462 N.E.2d 1176 [1984]; Excel Graphics Tech. v. CFG/AGSCB 75 Ninth Ave., 1 A.D.3d 65, 70, 767 N.Y.S.2d 99 [2003], lv. dismissed 2 N.Y.3d 794, 781 N.Y.S.2d 292, 814 N.E.2d 464 [2004] [distinguishing Simon & Son Upholstery v. 601 W. Assoc., 268 A.D.2d 359, 702 N.Y.S.2d 256 (2000) ] ). As defendants were in default under the sublease at the time they exercised the sublease renewal option, they were precluded from exercising such option under the terms of the renewal provision. We have considered defendants' other arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 29, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)