BROPHY v. BROPHY (1999)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Gemma BROPHY, Individually and as Mother and Guardian of Andrew Brophy, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bernard G. BROPHY, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: March 30, 1999

SULLIVAN, J.P., LERNER, ANDRIAS and SAXE, JJ.

Stephen C. Pascal, for Plaintiff-Respondent. Steven B. Ruchefsky, for Defendant-Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered July 13, 1998, which granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment for maintenance arrears, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff made a prima facie showing that she was entitled to contingent alimony, and therefore arrears. Defendant's submission of an affirmation from his attorney in opposition to the motion was insufficient to defeat summary judgment (Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562-563, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718).

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network