Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Guardianship, etc., RAMON C., et al., Dependent Children Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Juan M., Respondent-Appellant, Lutheran Social Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about January 3, 1997, which, inter alia, terminated appellant-father's parental rights, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to appellant-father's claim, the record does not establish that any objection was ever made to conducting this neglect proceeding in the absence of the father, who was incarcerated in a Federal prison. Accordingly, he waived his right to be present at the hearing (see, Matter of Abdul C., 200 A.D.2d 356, 357, 606 N.Y.S.2d 178). In any event, the father participated in the hearing through counsel and by telephone (see, Matter of James Carton K., 245 A.D.2d 374, 665 N.Y.S.2d 426, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 809, 670 N.Y.S.2d 403, 693 N.E.2d 750).
Inasmuch as petitioner established that the father had not communicated with the agency or the children in the six-month period prior to the filing of the petition, and had not offered mitigating circumstances to the contrary, the court properly made a finding of neglect (see, Matter of Anthony M., 195 A.D.2d 315, 600 N.Y.S.2d 37). The father's incarceration did not excuse such failure to communicate (see, Matter of Tikisha Aisha L., 253 A.D.2d 709, 678 N.Y.S.2d 95), and his lack of knowledge that his children had been transferred to a new agency is no excuse since he failed to communicate with the first agency. We have considered and rejected appellant's remaining claims.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 13, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)