Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Henry BRACY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J., at calendar calls and disqualification of counsel; Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered August 10, 1995, convicting defendant of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The calendar court properly exercised its discretion when, after the case had been pending for over a year including numerous adjournments due to defendant's retained counsel's other engagements, the court denied defendant's request for a further delay of many months' duration to permit counsel to complete a Federal trial of extraordinary length, and, instead, directed defendant to proceed with substitute retained counsel (see, People v. Childs, 247 A.D.2d 319, 324-326, 670 N.Y.S.2d 4, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 849, 677 N.Y.S.2d 79, 699 N.E.2d 439). (People v. Nevitt, 209 A.D.2d 341, 619 N.Y.S.2d 6, lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 865, 624 N.Y.S.2d 384, 648 N.E.2d 804). The danger of fading memories or unavailability of witnesses (albeit police witnesses), the risk of flight by defendant, and the public interest in prompt resolution of the serious charges against this multiple violent felony offender were compelling concerns that justified interference with an established attorney-client relationship given the length of the potential delay.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672). Issues of credibility were properly placed before the jury and we find no reason to disturb its findings.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 11, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)