Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Guy J. VELELLA, an attorney and counselor-at-law: Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Guy J. Velella, Respondent.
Respondent Guy J. Velella was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on July 8, 1971. At all times relevant to these proceedings, respondent, a New York State Senator, maintained senate offices in Albany and in Bronx County, within the First Judicial Department.
By an indictment filed in May 2002 respondent, chairman of the Bronx Republican Party, was charged in the Supreme Court, New York County, with conspiracy in the fourth degree in violation of Penal Law § 105.10(1), four counts of bribe receiving in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 200.11, and numerous violations of Public Officers Law §§ 73(2); (7)(a)(iv) and 77. On May 17, 2004, respondent pled guilty to conspiracy in the fourth degree, a class E felony, in full satisfaction of the indictment, and was sentenced to a one-year term of imprisonment. During his plea allocution respondent admitted that as a state senator, he made phone calls and met with government officials, some of which calls and meetings took place in New York County, to assist clients in obtaining business from these government agencies, and that these clients paid fees in excess of $10,000 to the law firm of respondent's father, which fees ultimately benefitted respondent financially.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b), striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys on the ground that he has been disbarred upon his conviction of a felony as defined by Judiciary Law § 90(4)(e). Respondent offers no opposition.
Accordingly, inasmuch as a conviction for any criminal offense classified as a felony results in automatic disbarment by operation of law (see Judiciary Law § 90[4][a], [e] ), the petition should be granted and respondent's name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys in the State of New York pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b), nunc pro tunc to May 17, 2004, the date of entry of the judgment of conviction (see Matter of Conroy, 309 A.D.2d 57, 764 N.Y.S.2d 688 [2003] ).
Respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, nunc pro tunc to May 17, 2004.
PER CURIAM.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 30, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)