Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Sean SCHRON, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered January 8, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on their Labor Law § 240 claim and denied defendants' cross motion for partial summary judgment dismissing said claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The plaintiff construction worker's deposition testimony that he was injured at the work site when a wooden scaffolding plank struck him on the head was prima facie evidence of a violation of § 240(1), shifting the burden to the owner/manager defendants to raise a factual issue on liability (see Aragon v. 233 W. 21st St., 201 A.D.2d 353, 354, 607 N.Y.S.2d 642 [1994] ). Defendants failed to rebut adequately plaintiffs' showing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 27, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)