Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arnold BRUCE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, J.), rendered December 19, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 8 years and 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence as fruits of an allegedly unlawful arrest. Defendant was pursued and captured by a civilian with the aid of a group of police officers and police academy recruits. To the extent that this assistance constituted a police seizure of defendant, it was a brief investigatory detention requiring only reasonable suspicion (see People v. Allen, 73 N.Y.2d 378, 540 N.Y.S.2d 971, 538 N.E.2d 323; People v. Hicks, 68 N.Y.2d 234, 508 N.Y.S.2d 163, 500 N.E.2d 861). Although the People's sole witness at the suppression hearing was the arresting officer, who arrived while defendant was already being detained, the totality of this officer's testimony as to what he saw and heard at the scene warranted the inference that the other police personnel possessed the requisite reasonable suspicion (see People v. Gonzalez, 91 N.Y.2d 909, 669 N.Y.S.2d 526, 692 N.E.2d 557; People v. Mims, 88 N.Y.2d 99, 113-114, 643 N.Y.S.2d 502, 666 N.E.2d 207). The victim immediately arrived and identified defendant, creating probable cause for defendant's arrest.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 10, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)