Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP, etc., ISRAEL ZACARIAS G., and Others, Dependent Children Under the Age of Fourteen Years, etc., Jury Consuelo C., etc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, St. Christopher-Ottilie, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about April 30, 2001, terminating respondents' parental rights to the subject children and awarding their custody and guardianship to the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency for the purposes of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The findings of neglect are supported clear and convincing evidence that respondents did not cooperate with the agency's diligent efforts to strengthen their parental relationships (see Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 385, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139). Concerning the mother, the agency diligently monitored her progress in the various treatment and other programs deemed necessary to a viable parental relationship, but she failed to complete a drug treatment program. Concerning the father, the agency diligently advised him of the need to enter a domestic violence counseling program with the mother or plan for the children's future without her, but he never attended such a program with the mother and refused to plan without her. A suspended judgment is unwarranted in view of respondents' refusal to deal with their domestic violence issues, and the father's refusal to accept the need to plan without the mother (see Matter of Charlene Lashay J., 280 A.D.2d 320, 720 N.Y.S.2d 469). The best interests of the children, who have been living in nurturingfoster homes for almost six years, warrant that they be freed for adoption.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 12, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)