Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP, etc., DANYEL RAMONA C., etc., A Dependent Child Under The Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Diego C., Respondent-Appellant, St. Christopher-Ottilie, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about June 5, 2001, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject child and committing her custody and guardianship to petitioner agency, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect (Marjory Fields, J.), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The agency's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship are established by clear and convincing evidence that the agency arranged for the child's regular visitation with respondent, who was incarcerated, kept respondent apprised of the child's progress and explored the resources provided by respondent (see Matter of Amanda C., 281 A.D.2d 714, 722 N.Y.S.2d 267, lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 714, 729 N.Y.S.2d 441, 754 N.E.2d 201). Although respondent maintained contact with the child, none of the resources he provided were viable. Respondent's inability to provide a realistic alternative to foster care until his release from prison constituted a failure to plan for the child's future warranting a finding of permanent neglect (see id.; Matter of Carmen N., 237 A.D.2d 607, 655 N.Y.S.2d 651, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 805, 663 N.Y.S.2d 511, 686 N.E.2d 223). Termination of respondent's parental rights so as to free the child for adoption by her foster parents, with whom the child has strongly bonded, is in the child's best interests.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 17, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)