Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Louis L. IBEKWEH, Claimant-Appellant, v. STATE of New York, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Appeals from three orders, Court of Claims (Gerard Weisberg, J.), entered April 12, 1993, November 21, 1995, and December 7, 1996, which denied claimant's motions to amend the caption either to substitute or add the City College of New York (“CCNY”) as a defendant, to vacate an order dismissing the claim on default, and to file a late claim against the City University of New York (“CUNY”), unanimously dismissed, without costs.
The appeal is untimely because the notice of appeal was served and filed more than 35 days after the dates of service of all three orders with notice of entry (CPLR 5513[a]; 5515[1]; 2103[b][2]; see, Placede v. City of New York, 210 A.D.2d 18, 619 N.Y.S.2d 563). Were we to reach the merits, we would affirm. The motion to amend the caption was properly denied because the court did not have jurisdiction over CUNY at the time it was made (see, Brinkley v. City Univ., 92 A.D.2d 805, 460 N.Y.S.2d 53). The motion to vacate claimant's default was properly denied because claimant failed to allege any wrongdoing on the part of the State, the only named defendant at that juncture. The motion to file a late claim was properly denied because claimant failed to allege an accrual date (Court of Claims Act § 11[b]; see, Park v. State of New York, 226 A.D.2d 153, 640 N.Y.S.2d 100), and also because, accepting the December 1990 accrual date stated in the original claim, the claim was time-barred (Court of Claims Act § 10[6]; see, Doe v. State of New York, 221 A.D.2d 218, 219, 634 N.Y.S.2d 57).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 23, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)