Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Robert M. MAZZOLI, Respondent, v. Joseph DI FABIO, et al., Respondents, Patrick A. Leone, Jr., and Suzanne Leone, Intervenors-Appellants.
In affirming the judgment, we note that petitioner did not, by filing an application for a use variance, submit to the jurisdiction of the Zoning Board of Appeals (see, Matter of Gaylord Disposal Serv. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 175 A.D.2d 543, 545, 572 N.Y.S.2d 803, lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 863, 578 N.Y.S.2d 877, 586 N.E.2d 60). The record establishes that petitioner was coerced by the threat of criminal penalties into filing that application. Petitioner maintained at all times that no variance was required because of a prior determination by the former Code Enforcement Officer.
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 19, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)